The Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) has urged government officials and agencies to unify their public statements in accordance with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s foreign policy direction, warning that conflicting positions could weaken the Philippines’ diplomatic stance amid escalating tensions with China over the West Philippine Sea.
The Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) has called on government officials and agencies to ensure that their public statements remain consistent with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s foreign policy direction, cautioning that contradictory remarks could affect the Philippines’ standing in international relations.
In its November 9, 2026 statement, the DFA pointed out that the 1987 Philippine Constitution recognizes the President as the chief architect of the country’s foreign policy. It emphasized the need for civilian government offices, uniformed personnel, and other public officials to maintain coordinated positions instead of independently advancing policies toward foreign governments.
The reminder was released amid growing exchanges between Philippine officials and the Chinese Embassy over the continuing disputes in the West Philippine Sea.
Among those who have publicly voiced criticism of China’s activities in the disputed waters are Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro Jr. and Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesperson Rear Admiral Jay Tarriela.
READ MORE ARTICLES:
- Sara Duterte Defense Mounts Fight as Impeachment Trial Intensifies
- DFA Urges Government Officials to Align Public Statements With Marcos’ Foreign Policy
- Entire SK Council in Sarangani Resigns
- Tacloban Lawyer Marino Buban Jr. Named Among Sara Duterte’s Impeachment Defense Witnesses
- Over 230,000 Fake Recruitment Posts Removed by Meta, TikTok Since 2022
The DFA warned that conflicting statements from government institutions could compromise the country’s diplomatic initiatives, especially with major international gatherings such as the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summits approaching.
It also stressed the importance of a unified diplomatic position as negotiations and discussions surrounding the proposed South China Sea Code of Conduct continue.
The department recognized the contributions of national security institutions, particularly the military and the Philippine Coast Guard, in monitoring and reporting developments in the West Philippine Sea. Nevertheless, it clarified that public transparency should complement rather than replace diplomatic efforts and formal discussions with other countries.
The DFA explained that transparency is an important instrument for protecting national interests but should not be treated as an independent strategy that takes the place of diplomatic negotiations. It further emphasized that government institutions need to coordinate their communications when addressing sensitive matters involving the country’s international relations.
The statement received different reactions from political analysts, lawmakers, and prominent personalities. Several analysts agreed with the DFA’s call for consistency, noting that disagreements among government agencies could expose divisions that China might use to its advantage.
They pointed out that maintaining a common government position is important in protecting the Philippines’ diplomatic interests, particularly as tensions in the West Philippine Sea continue.
On the other hand, former Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio questioned the DFA’s position, stressing that the Philippines operates as a democratic country where officials and lawmakers have the freedom to express opposing views on foreign policy.
Carpio maintained that members of Congress are entitled to examine, debate, and disagree with the President’s foreign policy decisions. He also noted that national policies are shaped through constitutional procedures and legislation.
Human rights advocate and former senator Leila de Lima, together with the Akbayan Party, also voiced concerns over the DFA’s announcement.
They emphasized that the West Philippine Sea is an issue affecting the entire country and that speaking against foreign aggression should not automatically be viewed as disobedience or misconduct. They further opposed the idea of giving the DFA exclusive control over public discussions concerning China’s activities and the Philippines’ maritime rights.
The developments reflect the challenges confronting the Marcos administration as it seeks to balance national security concerns, diplomatic relations, and public accountability amid continuing disagreements with China.
Although the DFA has called for government officials to follow a consistent foreign policy direction, critics maintain that freedom of expression and constructive public debate are equally important in a democratic government. With significant regional meetings approaching, the issue highlights the importance of coordinating the country’s diplomatic efforts while respecting the right of public officials to express their views on national sovereignty and security.